Improvement after a supplement is not the same as a comparative result
Start with the comparison. A before-and-after change alone cannot isolate the contribution of an ingredient.
Selected research topic
Findings differ across measurements or study conditions. The results below keep them separate.
Some findings concern patients or people with a deficiency.
What the comparison group used was not confirmed.
Single ingredientThis result is held for interpretation. That does not mean research found no effect.
One paper can appear under multiple measured outcomes or review reasons, so these counts should not be added together.
Human studies reported no clear between-group difference in BMD of the femoral neck.
Single-ingredient studies · Human studies · Includes patient groups · between-group comparison
1 publications linked to this result
Paper counts are separated by research topic below. One paper may contribute to multiple findings.
Analysis status: Public-ready
Ingredient analysis date:
How the grade was determined: B
The 65.2 evidence score includes 9 independent human studies and 9 clinical studies in the representative benefit area. The B tier remains conservative because of limited repetition across independent human clinical studies.
The grade is based mainly on the research area with the most evidence. It does not mean the same result was found in other areas.
Papers linked to this ingredient overall: 77
Papers linked to this topic 3 · distinct papers 3 · papers with a confirmed human comparison 2 · papers needing additional review 1
A publication may appear in more than one count. These numbers should not be added. Ingredient-wide papers, topic-linked papers, and sources in outcome groups use different scopes. Adding source counts may count the same paper more than once.
No clear difference in this measurement was found between the compared groups.
Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · Patient group
Between-group comparison
1 paper · 1 measured outcome
Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.
The study reported improvement in this measurement.
Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · Unspecified population
Between-group comparison
1 paper · 1 measured outcome
Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.
The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.
Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · Patient group
Between-group comparison
1 paper · 1 measured outcome
1 papers held from direction counts
Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.
Start with the comparison. A before-and-after change alone cannot isolate the contribution of an ingredient.
A reported null comparison contains a result. An abstract without an interpretable comparison leaves a question unresolved.
Count original research separately from research that reanalyzes it. Publication volume is neither replication nor a quality rating.
Findings from this ingredient alone are shown separately from those involving another supplement or medication.
No reviewed caution rules are available yet. Reported caution findings are shown below.
Review 3 combination findings and 0 findings that outperformed an ingredient alone.
Side effects reported for the ingredient alone are separated from findings involving another supplement or medication.
Symptoms or adverse events reported in studies without another active ingredient.
Combination findings are grouped by how the study compared them. This is not a recommendation to combine ingredients.
The combination showed improvement, but each ingredient's contribution is unclear.