biotech
Bio-AnalystSupplement research
person
arrow_backExplore/Beta-Alanine

Beta-Alanine

Selected research topic

Exercise performance

Findings differ across measurements or study conditions. The results below keep them separate.

Findings from a combination study cannot be attributed to this ingredient alone.

Publications for this topic
32
Human comparison publications
9
Publications needing review
21

Findings in the studies

  • 2,000-m rowing performance

    • A better result than the comparison group was reported.
      General population · Single ingredient · After 28 and 30 days
      Measurement and study conditions
      Study type
      Randomized controlled trial: subjects were randomly assigned to groups for comparison.
      Study population
      Human participants · General population
      Ingredients tested
      Single ingredient
      How results were compared
      Results were compared between groups. · Study comparison: Chronic beta-alanine versus placebo in the 2,000-m rowing time trial.
      Additional measurement information
      Primary outcome
      Measurement time
      After 28 and 30 days
  • average peak torque

    • A better result than the comparison group was reported.
      General population · Single ingredient · After 28 days
      Measurement and study conditions
      Study type
      Randomized controlled trial: subjects were randomly assigned to groups for comparison.
      Study population
      Human participants · General population
      Ingredients tested
      Single ingredient
      How results were compared
      Results were compared between groups. · Study comparison: Beta-alanine versus placebo.
      Additional measurement information
      Secondary outcome
      Measurement time
      After 28 days
  • average power at 1RM

    • A better result than the comparison group was reported.

      What the comparison group used was not confirmed.

      Single ingredient
      Measurement and study conditions
      Study type
      Randomized controlled trial: subjects were randomly assigned to groups for comparison.
      Study population
      Human participants · Participant characteristics were not confirmed.
      Ingredients tested
      Single ingredient
      How results were compared
      Results were compared between groups.
      Measurement time
      Not confirmed.
  • average power output

    • No clear difference from the comparison group was found.
      General population · Single ingredient · after 4 weeks
      Measurement and study conditions
      Study type
      Randomized controlled trial: subjects were randomly assigned to groups for comparison.
      Study population
      Human participants · General population
      Ingredients tested
      Single ingredient
      How results were compared
      Results were compared between groups. · Study comparison: beta-alanine versus placebo on 4-minute cycling time-trial average power
      Measurement time
      after 4 weeks
Other measured outcomes (8)
  • CMJ power

    • A better result than the comparison group was reported.
      General population · Single ingredient · 5 weeks
      Measurement and study conditions
      Study type
      Clinical trial
      Study population
      Human participants · General population
      Ingredients tested
      Single ingredient
      How results were compared
      Results were compared between groups. · Study comparison: beta-alanine versus placebo
      Additional measurement information
      Primary outcome
      Measurement time
      5 weeks
  • PW(CFT)

    • A better result than the comparison group was reported.

      Several ingredients were tested together, so this ingredient’s individual effect is unknown.

      General population · Combination study · 12 weeks
      Measurement and study conditions
      Study type
      Randomized controlled trial: subjects were randomly assigned to groups for comparison.
      Study population
      Human participants · General population
      Ingredients tested
      Ingredient combination
      How results were compared
      Results were compared between groups. · Study comparison: ONS+beta-alanine dose groups vs ONS alone
      Additional measurement information
      Primary outcome
      Measurement time
      12 weeks
  • race times

    • A better result than the comparison group was reported.
      General population · Single ingredient · After 28 days of supplementation
      Measurement and study conditions
      Study type
      Randomized controlled trial: subjects were randomly assigned to groups for comparison.
      Study population
      Human participants · General population
      Ingredients tested
      Single ingredient
      How results were compared
      Results were compared between groups. · Study comparison: Beta-alanine versus placebo; within-arm pre/post times also reported
      Additional measurement information
      Primary outcome
      Measurement time
      After 28 days of supplementation
  • Repeat sprint performance

    • No clear difference from the comparison group was found.

      What the comparison group used was not confirmed.

      Single ingredient
      Measurement and study conditions
      Study type
      Clinical trial
      Study population
      Human participants · Participant characteristics were not confirmed.
      Ingredients tested
      Single ingredient
      How results were compared
      Results were compared between groups.
      Measurement time
      Not confirmed.
  • Sprint endurance

    • No clear difference from the comparison group was found.

      What the comparison group used was not confirmed.

      Single ingredient
      Measurement and study conditions
      Study type
      Randomized controlled trial: subjects were randomly assigned to groups for comparison.
      Study population
      Human participants · Participant characteristics were not confirmed.
      Ingredients tested
      Single ingredient
      How results were compared
      Results were compared between groups.
      Measurement time
      Not confirmed.
  • total work performed during the final third of the assessment

    • A better result than the comparison group was reported.
      General population · Single ingredient · After 28 days
      Measurement and study conditions
      Study type
      Randomized controlled trial: subjects were randomly assigned to groups for comparison.
      Study population
      Human participants · General population
      Ingredients tested
      Single ingredient
      How results were compared
      Results were compared between groups. · Study comparison: Beta-alanine versus placebo.
      Additional measurement information
      Secondary outcome
      Measurement time
      After 28 days
  • Time-to-exhaustion during the isometric endurance test

    Other human research, including observational studies and reviews
    • A change was reported before and after use. Its cause cannot be isolated.
      General population · Single ingredient · after 4 weeks
      Measurement and study conditions
      Study type
      Randomized controlled trial: subjects were randomly assigned to groups for comparison.
      Study population
      Human participants · General population
      Ingredients tested
      Single ingredient
      How results were compared
      Changes within the same group were compared. · Study comparison: within-BA-group change from baseline; placebo unchanged
      Additional measurement information
      Secondary outcome
      Measurement time
      after 4 weeks
  • exercise capacity

    Research with unclear study subject or type
    • A change was reported, but the comparison could not be confirmed.
      Single ingredient
      Measurement and study conditions
      Study type
      Systematic review
      Study population
      Recorded population category: General population. Whether the research involved humans needs confirmation.
      Ingredients tested
      Single ingredient
      How results were compared
      Study comparison: reviewed beta-alanine protocols; no explicit common comparator
      Measurement time
      mean intervention duration 11.7 ± 1.0 weeks

This result is held for interpretation. That does not mean research found no effect.

Outcome groups needing additional review (14)
  • competition performance · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Direction unclear: 1
  • endurance · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Evidence criteria check: 1
  • exercise performance · Distinct papers needing additional review: 2Evidence criteria check: 2
  • High-intensity intermittent exercise performance · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Evidence criteria check: 1
  • LDT · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Evidence criteria check: 1
  • LTT · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Evidence criteria check: 1
  • number of moves · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Evidence criteria check: 1
  • peak power during WAnT1 · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Evidence criteria check: 1
  • Sprint performance · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Evidence criteria check: 1
  • time to failure · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Evidence criteria check: 1
  • total number of "slaps" · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Evidence criteria check: 1
  • TTT · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Evidence criteria check: 1
  • Vertical jump performance · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Evidence criteria check: 1
  • Yo-Yo test · Distinct papers needing additional review: 1Evidence criteria check: 1

One paper can appear under multiple measured outcomes or review reasons, so these counts should not be added together.

Representative outcome and study details

Human studies reported between-group improvement in 2,000-m rowing performance.

Single-ingredient studies · Human studies · between-group comparison

1 publications linked to this result

  • Route, form, dose, or population details are incomplete, so the findings cannot be confirmed as directly comparable.
Data coverage and detailed study classifications

Paper counts are separated by research topic below. One paper may contribute to multiple findings.

Analysis status: Public-ready

Ingredient analysis date:

How the grade was determined: A

The 84.3 evidence score includes 23 independent human studies and 22 clinical studies in the representative benefit area. The A tier reflects evidence directness, repetition, and consistency together.

The grade is based mainly on the research area with the most evidence. It does not mean the same result was found in other areas.

Papers linked to this ingredient overall: 77

Papers linked to this topic 32 · distinct papers 32 · papers with a confirmed human comparison 9 · papers needing additional review 21

A publication may appear in more than one count. These numbers should not be added. Ingredient-wide papers, topic-linked papers, and sources in outcome groups use different scopes. Adding source counts may count the same paper more than once.

  • 2,000-m rowing performance: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 1
  • average peak torque: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 1
  • average power at 1RM: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 1
  • average power output: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 1
  • CMJ power: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 1
  • competition performance: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • endurance: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • exercise capacity: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • exercise performance: Sources represented in this measurement group: 2 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • High-intensity intermittent exercise performance: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • LDT: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • LTT: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • number of moves: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • peak power during WAnT1: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • PW(CFT): Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 1
  • race times: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 1
  • Repeat sprint performance: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 1
  • Sprint endurance: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 1
  • Sprint performance: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • time to failure: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • Time-to-exhaustion during the isometric endurance test: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • total number of "slaps": Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • total work performed during the final third of the assessment: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 1
  • TTT: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • Vertical jump performance: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0
  • Yo-Yo test: Sources represented in this measurement group: 1 · Distinct papers with human comparisons for this outcome: 0

What the research found

average power output

No clear difference in this measurement was found between the compared groups.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · General population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Sprint endurance

No clear difference in this measurement was found between the compared groups.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · Unspecified population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

2,000-m rowing performance

The study reported improvement in this measurement.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · General population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

average peak torque

The study reported improvement in this measurement.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · General population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

average power at 1RM

The study reported improvement in this measurement.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · Unspecified population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

PW(CFT)

The study reported improvement in this measurement.

Controlled study in people · Ingredient combination · General population

Several ingredients were used together. This does not establish the effect of this ingredient alone or synergy.

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

race times

The study reported improvement in this measurement.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · General population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Time-to-exhaustion during the isometric endurance test

A change was reported before and after use. Its cause cannot be isolated.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · General population

Within-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

total work performed during the final third of the assessment

The study reported improvement in this measurement.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · General population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

CMJ power

The study reported improvement in this measurement.

Other evidence · Single ingredient · General population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Repeat sprint performance

No clear difference in this measurement was found between the compared groups.

Other evidence · Single ingredient · Unspecified population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

exercise capacity

A change was reported, but the comparison could not be confirmed.

Review · Single ingredient · General population

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

Review overlap with primary papers is unknown; counts stay separate.

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

competition performance

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · General population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

endurance

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Controlled study in people · Ingredient combination · General population

Several ingredients were used together. This does not establish the effect of this ingredient alone or synergy.

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

exercise performance

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Meta-analysis · Single ingredient · General population

The comparison could not be confirmed.

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Review overlap with primary papers is unknown; counts stay separate.

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

exercise performance

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Review · Single ingredient · Unspecified population

The comparison could not be confirmed.

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Review overlap with primary papers is unknown; counts stay separate.

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

High-intensity intermittent exercise performance

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Review · Single ingredient · Unspecified population

The comparison could not be confirmed.

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Review overlap with primary papers is unknown; counts stay separate.

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

LDT

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Meta-analysis · Single ingredient · General population

The comparison could not be confirmed.

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Review overlap with primary papers is unknown; counts stay separate.

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

LTT

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Meta-analysis · Single ingredient · General population

The comparison could not be confirmed.

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Review overlap with primary papers is unknown; counts stay separate.

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

number of moves

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · Patient group

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

peak power during WAnT1

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Controlled study in people · Unknown intervention · Patient group

Within-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Sprint performance

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · Unspecified population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

time to failure

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · Patient group

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

total number of "slaps"

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · Patient group

Within-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

TTT

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Meta-analysis · Single ingredient · General population

The comparison could not be confirmed.

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Review overlap with primary papers is unknown; counts stay separate.

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Unspecified measured outcome

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · Unspecified population

The comparison could not be confirmed.

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Unspecified measured outcome

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · Unspecified population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Unspecified measured outcome

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Controlled study in people · Single ingredient · Unspecified population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

4 papers · 4 measured outcomes

4 papers held from direction counts

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Unspecified measured outcome

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Meta-analysis · Single ingredient · Unspecified population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Review overlap with primary papers is unknown; counts stay separate.

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Unspecified measured outcome

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Other evidence · Single ingredient · Unspecified population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Unspecified measured outcome

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Review · Single ingredient · Unspecified population

The comparison could not be confirmed.

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Review overlap with primary papers is unknown; counts stay separate.

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Unspecified measured outcome

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Meta-analysis · Unknown intervention · Unspecified population

The comparison could not be confirmed.

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Review overlap with primary papers is unknown; counts stay separate.

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Vertical jump performance

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Controlled study in people · Ingredient combination · General population

Several ingredients were used together. This does not establish the effect of this ingredient alone or synergy.

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

Yo-Yo test

The study needs further checking before its result can be interpreted.

Meta-analysis · Single ingredient · General population

Between-group comparison

Analysis coverage and paper counts

1 paper · 1 measured outcome

1 papers held from direction counts

Review overlap with primary papers is unknown; counts stay separate.

Direction counts are distinct papers within each row. Outcome contributions count endpoint results, so one paper may contribute more than once.

How to read research findings

How should I read research findings?

Research guides

Side effects and combination findings

Findings from this ingredient alone are shown separately from those involving another supplement or medication.

No reviewed caution rules are available yet. Reported caution findings are shown below.

Findings to review with care

Side effects reported for the ingredient alone are separated from findings involving another supplement or medication.

Side effects reported with this ingredient alone

Symptoms or adverse events reported in studies without another active ingredient.

paraesthesia1 papers
Beta‑alanine supplementation is generally safe in healthy adults; the only reported side effect is mild paraesthesia, which can be reduced by lower divided doses or sustained‑release formulations.Human studies · Systematic review