It remains to be determined whether niacin may have clinical utility in particular subgroups, such as statin intolerant patients with hypercholesterolemia or those who cannot achieve a sufficient reduction in LDLc, and whether a potentially beneficial effect o
Niacin
Cholesterol and triglycerides is the main area connected here, and any felt benefit should be read together with the human evidence base.
Representative tier calculated from paper evidence that passed the collection audit.
Main benefit evidence
The representative ingredient tier is calculated from these target-level evidence groups.
Blood lipids3 studiesTier-BCholesterol and triglyceridesFairly consistent positive signal in studiesFelt benefit focusPatient-group studyPotential benefit studied in Blood lipids.Open metrics>
Nutrient status2 studiesTier-CNutrient status markersFairly consistent positive signal in studiesResearch marker focusPatient-group studyThis card is closer to a measured biomarker or lab outcome than a directly felt user benefit.Closer to a research marker than a directly felt benefit.Open metrics>
Condition-specific evidence1 studiesTier-CCondition-specific health context in a specific contextSome positive signal observedResearch marker focusSupplement contextThis result was studied for Condition-specific health context in a narrower population or condition-specific context. It should not be generalized as an everyday supplement effect.Closer to a research marker than a directly felt benefit.Open metrics>
Glucose and metabolic health1 studiesTier-CGlucose and metabolic health markersSome positive signal observedResearch marker focusPatient-group studyThis card is closer to a measured biomarker or lab outcome than a directly felt user benefit.Closer to a research marker than a directly felt benefit.Open metrics>
Blood pressure and vascular health1 studiesTier-CBlood pressure and vascular health markersSome positive signal observedResearch marker focusPatient-group studyThis card is closer to a measured biomarker or lab outcome than a directly felt user benefit.Closer to a research marker than a directly felt benefit.Open metrics>
Stress and mood1 studiesTier-CStress Response and Sleep ChangesSome positive signal observedFelt benefit focusPatient-group studyThese findings come from stress response, cortisol, anxiety, or sleep outcomes. They may mix felt benefits with physiological markers.Open metrics>
Recent research
10 new papers were added in this period. No new risk signal was identified.
What's new
Most notable recent finding
Key cautions to review
Standalone side-effect signals and combination cautions are listed separately.
Standalone side effects
Evidence summaries
Paper IDs and full lists are private. Only study types and summaries are shown.
The risk of myopathy was increased by adding ERN/LRPT to simvastatin 40 mg daily (with or without ezetimibe), particularly in Chinese patients whose myopathy rates on simvastsatin were higher.
In randomized controlled trials, triglyceride lowering is associated with lower risk of major vascular events, even after adjusting for LDL-C lowering, although the effect is attenuated when REDUCE-IT is excluded.
3 more summariesLimited representative sample by study type.>
It is demonstrated that full-dose niacin/moderate-dose simvastatin combination has sustained benefits on atherogenic apoB lipoproteins, at least comparable to high-dose simvastatin, while also raising HDL-cholesterol.
This review summarises the research findings for each source of cognitive impairment for which NAD+ precursor supplementation has been investigated as a therapy and concludes that further properly controlled clinical research is needed to provide definitive an
It is indicated that inflammation, as indexed by GlycA, is unaffected by ERN treatment but is significantly associated with the residual risk of CVD and death in patients treated to low levels of LDL-C.